ISSN 1728-2985
ISSN 2414-9020 Online

A systematic review of the efficacy of tamsulosin as part of combination therapy in adult patients with chronic bacterial/abacterial prostatitis and chronic pelvic pain syndrome

Kasimova A.R., Kolbin A.S., Spivak L.G.

1) Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Saint Petersburg, Russia; 2) R.R. Vreden National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Saint Petersburg, Russia; 3) I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia
Prostatitis is an inflammatory disease of the prostate gland that can present with lower abdominal pain, urinary incontinence, and sexual dysfunction. The diagnosis of prostatitis encompasses two main conditions: acute bacterial prostatitis (ABP) and chronic bacterial prostatitis (CBP). Urinary dysfunction is a key factor in the pathogenesis of chronic prostatitis. Overactive contraction of the urinary sphincter can cause bladder outlet obstruction and residual urine, which can lead to urinary reflux into the prostate. Alpha-1-adrenergic receptor antagonists (alpha blockers) are a class of drugs that inhibit smooth muscle contraction in the prostate and bladder neck. Tamsulosin is the first selective α1-adrenergic receptor antagonist, primarily the α1A and α1D subtypes, which are found in the smooth muscle of the prostate, bladder neck, and prostatic urethra. Blockade of these receptors reduces smooth muscle tone in these structures, which, in turn, improves urine flow from the bladder.
We carried out a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the efficacy of tamsulosin in the treatment of acute and chronic bacterial and abacterial prostatitis, as well as chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS). A search for clinical trials was carried out in the PubMed database, the clinical trials registry clinicaltrials.gov, and the Russian electronic library elibrary.ru by two independent researchers using keywords describing treatments that potentially included tamsulosin.
The search yielded information on 21 publications, 20 of which were included in the systematic review. Five studies were non-comparative, meaning they analyzed only patients receiving tamsulosin in addition to background therapy. The remaining studies had different comparison groups and could include active strategies such as antibacterial, analgesic, anti-inflammatory, herbal (urological) medications, and others. Treatment duration ranged from 4 to 52 weeks. The prescribed dose of tamsulosin was 0.4 mg orally once daily. Most studies used the NIH-CPSI (National Institute of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index) scores to evaluate outcomes. The average age of the participants ranged from 28.9 to 59.1 years. The quality of the included studies was highly variable.
Of the 20 studies included in this review, 19 examined the use of tamsulosin in patients with CP/CPPS. Positive treatment outcomes were observed in all studies using tamsulosin. Increases in maximum urinary flow rate, significant symptom regression, as measured by standardized scales, and improvements in quality of life were observed. The greatest differences in symptom regression were observed early in treatment, up to 45 days. This is likely due to the fact that urinary dysfunction, pain, and decreased quality of life become more prominent early in the disease course.
The safety of the treatment was assessed in 15 of the 20 studies. No standardized scales were used to assess safety. The safety of tamsulosin was assessed based on the reporting of adverse reactions. The development of serious adverse reactions (defined in Roszdravnadzor Order No. 1071 of February 15, 2017) was reported in two studies, but it was not possible to reliably link them to tamsulosin use.
Conclusion. The results of this systematic review confirm that tamsulosin is an effective drug for inclusion in combination treatment regimens for various forms of prostatitis, including CBP, chronic abacterial prostatitis, and CPPS. Its use significantly reduces symptoms such as pain and dysuria, which in turn improves patients' quality of life.

About the Authors

Corresponding author: A.R. Kasimova – Ph.D., MD, Associate Professor. Associate Professor, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Evidence-Based Medicine, Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University; clinical pharmacologist, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, R.R. Vreden National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics, St. Petersburg, Russia; e-mail: kasi-alina@yandex.ru